Coca Cola Bottling with Fuel Cell in New York

on Thursday, July 2, 2009

HELMSFORD, N.Y. -- Coca Cola Enterprises signed a 10-year contract with UTC Power that will bring two fuel cells to its southern New York bottling plant.

The UTC Power fuel cells will produce heat and energy that can satisfy nearly a third of demand at Coca Cola’s bottling plant in Elmsford, N.Y. The project received $2 million in funds from the state’s Energy Research and Development Authority.

  • South Windsor, Conn.-based UTC Power will retain ownership of the fuel cells, in addition to operating and maintaining them.
  • The company began offering the 10-year energy services agreement a few years ago, according to company spokeswoman Peg Hashem.“It’s helpful for those who don’t want to spend the capital upfront,” she said.
  • Fuel cells produce electricity, heat and water by combining hydrogen and oxygen in an electrochemical process.
  • The PureCell 400 fuel cells to be deployed at Coca Cola’s bottling plant are more than twice as energy efficient as traditional power sources and can each generate up to 400 kW of electricity and up to 1.7 million Btu/hour of heat, according to company materials.
    UTC Power's PureCell 400 can generate up to 400 kW of electricity and 1.7 million Btu/hour of heat
  • UTC Power, which is a unit of United Technologies Corp., has seen the most success with its energy services contract program in states that offer incentives, she said, such as California, New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts.
  • There must also be access to natural gas.
  • Hashem believes the Coca Cola deal will be the fuel cell’s first application in a bottling plant when they are delivered next year.

Coca Cola said in a prepared statement it plans to deploy fuel cells to other facilities in North America and Western Europe.

In addition to producing fuel cells for transportation applications, UTC Power has also installed more than 260 stationary fuel cells in 19 countries.

Ideal sites for stationary fuel cells, Hashem said, should operate continuously. “

It also makes the most sense when it is not only generating power, but can take waste heat and put it to work by heating the facility or running it through a chiller for cooling,” she said.

Previous sites include hospitals, data centers, hotels and supermarkets.

For example, a Whole Foods Market in Dedham, Mass., will become the first supermarket in the state to use the PureCell 400 fuel cell to generate 90 percent of its power. The system will also produce almost all of the hot water used at the store when it begins operating later this year. The state provided a $400,000 grant for the project, which is also governed by an energy services contract.

The Rest @ Greenbiz

Protonex Technology

on Friday, January 16, 2009

About Protonex Technology Corporation

Protonex Technology Corporation develops and manufactures compact, lightweight and high-
performance fuel cell systems for portable power applications in the 100 to 1000-watt range.

  • The Company’s fuel cell systems are designed to meet the needs of military, commercial, consumer and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers for off-grid applications underserved by existing technologies by providing customizable, stand-alone portable power solutions and systems that may be hybridized with existing power technologies.

The Company is based in Southborough, Massachusetts.

Fuel Cell Corridor

on Thursday, January 15, 2009

(from thier Br0uchure)

Ohio is the top destination for the fuel cell industry. Ohio is internationally recognized as a global center for the fuel cell industry. Here, there is a unique combination of knowledge, resources and infrastructure to support the development of this clean and efficient energy technology.

Ohio's advantages include a coordinated partnership of government, industry and
universities (which creates efficiencies in bringing viable products to market) as
well as an existing manufacturing/advanced materials network and exemplary
government funding and legal/regulatory framework.

The result is a hotbed of fuel cell businesses that are making real products today.

Fuel Cell Corridor web site

Connecticute Regualtion May hold up Fuel Cell Deployment

on Monday, January 12, 2009

December 21, 2008

If fuel cells are going to be the energy technology of the future, the state may have to
jettison the regulatory mindset of the past. State energy regulators may stop the largest
residential construction project in the state from using a Connecticut-made fuel cell to
power the building.

The project in question is 360 State St., a 32-story, 500-unit apartment building under
construction across from the State Street train station in New Haven. The building will
contain retail space, including a fitness center and a grocery, and enclosed parking for
500 cars. At nearly 700,000 square feet, it may be the largest single residential building
ever built in the state. Developer Bruce Becker also planned to make it the greenest.
Becker has included 20 energy-saving technologies — a green roof, double-glazed
windows and other features — and hopes to power the building with a 400-kilowatt fuel
cell made by UTC Power of South Windsor. He said if it all comes together, the
skyscraper will be the first residential building in Connecticut to achieve Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold Certification from the U.S. Green
Building Council.

The tricky part is the fuel cell. The project received a $900,000 grant from the
Connecticut Clean Energy Fund to help pay for the power-generating device. The grant
would cover slightly more than half the cost. To pay for the rest, and to maintain the fuel
cell, Becker proposed a plan he used for a similarly sized building called "The Octagon"
he built four years ago on Roosevelt Island in New York City.

Basically, he wants to generate electricity for the building from the fuel cell, and charge the tenants what they would pay if they weregetting the juice from United Illuminating, the local utility.

The building would still have a relationship with UI, to whom it would sell excess generation or buy power if it was needed for summer peak periods. Becker, as landlord, would have one "master meter" for UI. He would install "sub meters" for all the tenants.

This seemingly sensible idea needed approval from the state Department of Public Utility Control. It went before a hearing in September. On Dec.11, the DPUC issued a draft decision turning down the proposal. Master metering, as this arrangement is sometimes called,
has been historically unpopular with regulators. Traditionally, landlords have simply split
the cost of electricity in a building among the tenants. Thus, individual tenants were not
rewarded for conserving electricity, so tended to use and pay more for power.
But Becker said new technology allows each tenant to be accurately billed for only the
power that is used, and for a disinterested third party to monitor the billing. This, he said,
is what is done in New York.

But not in Connecticut. Here, master metering is allowed in marina slips and
campgrounds, and has been allowed in some residential contexts, such as subsidized
senior housing. But the department ruled that Becker's proposal didn't qualify "under

The department said it did not have the authority to create de facto utility companies,
which it does not have the capacity to regulate. The commission also said the proposal
would involve resale of electricity for profit, which is not allowed.

The decision says Becker can achieve the benefits of fuel cell technology by having the
utility buy back the excess power he generates, as a 2007 state law requires. Becker
said the rates of reimbursement under that arrangement are not high enough to cover the
cost of deploying the fuel cell.

This is a preliminary decision. The parties must return for oral arguments, after which it
could change. If the DPUC is interpreting present law correctly, and I have no reason to
think otherwise, then the law has not kept up with technology and needs to be changed,
muy pronto. Otherwise we will have the absurd situation of the legislature and some
state agencies encouraging developers to use fuel cell technology and another state
agency telling them they can't.

Becker hopes to have the DPUC change its mind. If the ruling stands, he said he may
appeal to the courts or ask for legislative relief. Failing that, he said he will be forced to
either abandon the fuel cell idea or use a much smaller cell.

That would be a shameful loss. The legislature has encouraged fuel cells and on-site or
"distributed" generation for many good reasons. Fuel cells are a highly efficient and
extremely clean form of power. Distributed generation lessens power line congestion, a
chronic problem here, and improves energy security.

On the other hand, the new technology has to be implemented without putting distribution
companies such as UI and their customers at risk of higher costs or service changes. So
it's complicated. But it must be worked out.

Whole Article @ Curant.com

Fuel Cell Animation

on Friday, January 2, 2009


Fuel Cell Terminology & Definitions 101

on Sunday, December 21, 2008

Glossary of Fuel Cell Terms

Alkali: A chemical "base" (loosely, the opposite of an acid). Certain types of alkalis (especially potassium hydroxide) have been used as fuel cell electrolytes.

Anion: A negative ion. Alkali, molten carbonate and solid oxide fuel cells are "anion-mobile" cells – anions migrate through the electrolyte toward the anode.

Anode: One of two electrodes in a fuel cell or battery. In a fuel cell it is where the fuel reacts or "oxidizes", and releases electrons.

Capital Cost: The purchase price of a power generating system.

Carnot Limit: A theoretical limit on the efficiency of an engine based on the flow of heat between two reservoirs. Named for its discoverer Sadi Carnot (1796-1832) of France, this limit stems from basic physical laws and applies to all steam engines. Fossil fuel and nuclear power plants are bound by this limit, but most fuel cells are not.

Catalyst: A substance that causes or speeds a chemical reaction without itself being affected.

Cathode: One of two electrodes in a fuel cell or battery. In a fuel cell, it is where oxygen (usually taken from the air) "reduction" occurs.

Cation: A positive ion. Phosphoric acid and PEM fuel cells are "cation-mobile" cells – the cation migrates through the electrolyte toward the cathode.

Cogeneration: The use of waste heat from industrial processing, a steam turbine, or a fuel cell to generate electricity. Harnessing otherwise wasted heat boosts the efficiency of power-generating systems.

Direct Fuel Cell: A type of fuel cell in which a hydrocarbon fuel is fed directly to the fuel cell stack, without requiring an external "reformer" to generate hydrogen.

Electrode: An electrical terminal that conducts an electric current into or out of a fuel cell.

Electrolyte: A chemical compound that conducts ions from one electrode to the other inside a fuel cell.

Electron: A sub-atomic particle carrying a negative charge.

Fuel Cell: A device for generating electricity by the chemical combination a fuel and oxygen.

Generating Capacity: The maximum amount of electric power produced by a generator.

Graphite: A soft form of the element carbon. It is used for pencil leads, as a lubricant, as a moderator in nuclear reactors, and for other products. It does not burn easily or fuse at high temperatures, and is an important material in the construction of phosphoric acid fuel cells.

Hydrogen: A chemical element consisting of one proton and one electron. Two hydrogen atoms combine with one oxygen atom to form a molecule of water. Hydrogen serves as the fuel for most fuel cells.

Inverter: A device used to convert direct current electricity produced by a fuel cell (or other source) to alternating current.

Ion: An atom that carries a positive or negative charge due to the loss or gain of an electron.

kW: Kilowatt (1,000 watts). A measure of electric power.

kWh: Kilowatt-hour (1,000 watts for one hour). A measure of electric power consumption.

Matrix: A framework within a fuel cell that supports an electrolyte.

Molten Carbonate: A type of fuel cell electrolyte that contains carbon, oxygen and another element. Solid at room temperature, it must be melted in order to function.

MW: Megawatt (1,000,000 watts). A measure of electric power.

MWh: Megawatt-hour (1,000,000 watts for one hour). A measure of electric power consumption.

Nafion: A sulfuric acid in a solid polymer form. It is usually the electrolyte of PEM fuel cells.

O&M Costs: Operations and Maintenance. The cost of keeping a power plant running and in good repair.

Oxygen: A chemical element consisting of eight protons, eight neutrons and eight electrons. Two hydrogen atoms combine with one oxygen atom to form a molecule of water.

Peak Load: The maximum demand for electricity from an electrical system in a given period of time.

Phosphoric Acid: A solution of the elements phosphorus, hydrogen, and oxygen that serves as the electrolyte for one type of fuel cell. Chemically: 4H3PO4.

Polymer: A natural or synthetic compound composed of repeated links of simple molecules.

Potassium Hydroxide: A solution of the elements potassium, hydrogen, and oxygen that serves as the electrolyte for one type of fuel cell. Chemically: KOH.

Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM): A polymer sheet that serves as the electrolyte in one type of fuel cell.

Reformer: A device that extracts pure hydrogen from hydrocarbons.

Regenerative Fuel Cells: Several fuel cell types in which fuel and, in some types, the oxidant are regenerated from the oxidation product.

Solid Oxide: A solid combination of oxygen and another element (often zirconium) that serves as the electrolyte for one type of fuel cell.

Stack: Individual fuel cells connected in series within a generating assembly.

Source : Smithsonian's American History

Plug Power

on Thursday, December 18, 2008

Plug Power, seem to be building one system at a time, they have participated in some US goverment military housing projects, and a few others.


Corporate Headquarters
968 Albany Shaker Road (directions)
Latham, New York 12110
Tel: 518.782.7700
Fax: 518.782.9060

Canada1
3120 Vanier Place
Richmond, B.C. V6V 2J2
Tel: 604.303.0050
Fax: 604.231.0400

Washington, D.C.
499 South Capitol Street,
SWSuite 606
Washington, D.C. 20003
Tel: 202.484.5300
Fax: 202.554.2896
government@plugpower.com

Europe/Middle East/Africa
Wilmersdorf 50 (directions)
7327 AC Apeldoorn
The Netherlands
Tel: 31 55 53 81 000
Fax: 31 55 53 81 099apeldoorn@plugpower.com

ZAO Independent Power Technologies

on Monday, December 15, 2008

ZAO Independent Power Technologies

Cascade-6

  • 6kw Alkaline Fule Cell, seems to be based on Space Station Technology
  • 6.0 kW Voltage Output: 30.0 - 42.5 V
  • Maximum Current Output: 200 A
  • Fuel: Industrial Grade Hydrogen Fuel
  • Consumption: <>
  • Pressure: Atmospheric
  • Ambient Temperature Range: -20 to +40 °С (-4 to +104 oF)
  • Maximum Relative Humidity: 98% at 25 °С
  • Dimensions (l×w×h): 125 cm × 58.2 cm × 86.3 cm (48.8” × 22.7” × 33.7”)
  • Gross Weight: <>
  • Start-up Time: <>
  • Electrolyte: 6.6 M KOH (aqueous solution)
  • Emissions: H2O (vapor), heat DC Output: 1 pair negative and positive terminals
  • Hydrogen Supply Pressure: 4-6 atm (59-88 psi)

3rd Mytishchinskaya 16 bldg 60
Moscow129626
Russian Federation
phone:
+ 7 495 687 9817 + 7 495 684 1635
fax:
+ 7 495 787 5361


info@independentpower.biz

Fuel Cell Manufacturers

on Tuesday, December 9, 2008

They make a 5 kw SOFC Fuel cell: Acumentrics’ 5000 Electric Power Generator

  • Efficient: Peak efficiencies between 40-50%; up to 90% with waste heat recovery.
  • Silent: Whisper quiet electrochemical process generates continuous electricity.
  • Internal scrubbing: Negligible NOx and SOx output; reduced CO2 output.
  • Solid State: Ceramic fuel cell tubes.
  • Fuel-flexible: Compatible with natural gas, propane, biofuels, LPG, H2 \
  • Site flexible: Small scale package is easy to site.
  • Grid-tie option: Allows connection to utility grid for peak shaving and net-metering.
  • Easy operation: Rapid start and stop. Fuels can be stored onsite or delivered at residential line pressures.
  • No external or internal pressure boosting required.
  • Communications ready: Monitor and control using built-in Ethernet port.


  • Altergy

Altergy Systems designs and manufactures proprietary proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell systems, collectively known as Altergy Freedom Power™ products. These compact, rugged, high efficiency systems produce power at the point of use -- making reliable, distributed power generation a reality.

Freedom Power™ Systems provide an excellent alternative to batteries and generators. Their plug and play design allows system modules to stand alone or be combined to produce a wide range of power output (1-30kW).

InfraStruXure Fuel

  • Cell 30 kw


  • Analytic Power

        • Mark 902 Transportation PEM 85 kW
          Mark 9 SSL
          Materials Handling / Light
          Mobility PEM 4.4 - 19.3 kW
          Mark 1030 Cogeneration PEM 1.3 kW
          Mark 1020 ACS
          Back-up power / Light
          Mobility PEM 300 - 5000 W
          HD6* Transportation / Bus PEM 65 or 130 kW net
          DFC 300MA Stationary MCFC 300 kW
          DFC 1500MA Stationary MCFC 1200 kW
          DFC 3000 Stationary MCFC 2400 kW
          • Brennstoffzellentechnik GmbH (ZBT): Manufactures Hydrogen fuel Cell Stacks


          • Cellkraft Small FC Up to 2 KW of PEM


          • Ceramic Fuel Cells Ltd CFCL is an Australian based world leader in developing solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology to provide reliable, energy efficient, high quality, and low-emission electricity from widely available natural gas and renewable fuels. CFCL is developing SOFC products for small-scale on-site micro combined heat and power (m-CHP) and distributed generation units that co-generate electricity and heat for domestic use.

          • ECG


          • EDC Ovonics


          • ERDC


          • European Fuel Cell GmbH


          • Fuel Cell Technologies


          • FuelCell Energy


          • Fuji Electric


          • GenCell


          • General Electric


          • Global Thermoelectric


          • Global Thermoelectric


          • GM


          • H Power Corp.


          • HELION


          • Hoku Scientific and IdaTech


          • Hydra Fuel Cell Corp


          • HydroGen Corporation


          • Hydrogenics Corp

Hydrogenics USA

27201 Tourney Road,

Suite 201

Valencia, CA

USA 91355

Phone: 661.253.2593Fax: 905.361.3626



          • IdaTech


          • Industrial Research Laboratory


          • Intelligent Energy


          • Ion America


          • Ishikawajima Shibaura Machinery Co


          • M-C Power Corp


          • Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co


          • Minaton (Russian Institute of Atomic Energy)


          • Mitsubishi Electric Corp


          • Mitsubishi Heavy Industries


          • MOSAIC Energy


          • MTU CFC Solutions GmbH


          • NedStack Fuel Cell Technology BV


          • Nuvera


          • P21 GmbH


          • Plug Power


          • Sanyo Electric Co.


          • Schatz Energy Research Center


          • Schunk


          • Siemens Power Generation, Inc


          • neration, Inc.


          • Smart Fuel Cell AG


          • Sulzer Hexis


          • Teledyne Energy Systems


          • Teledyne Energy Systems


          • 'Tokyo Gas


          • Toshiba


          • Tropical S.A.


          • University of Queensland


          • UTC Power


          • Voller Energy Group


          • Wärtsilä'


          • ZTEK Corp. Specialize in High efficiency fuel reformers for fuel cells, etc..

        • Mark 902 Transportation PEM 85 kW 􀀹
          Mark 9 SSL
          Materials Handling / Light
          Mobility PEM 4.4 - 19.3 kW 􀀹
          Mark 1030 Cogeneration PEM 1.3 kW 􀀹
          Mark 1020 ACS
          Back-up power / Light
          Mobility PEM 300 - 5000 W 􀀹
          HD6* Transportation / Bus PEM 65 or 130 kW net 􀀹
          DFC 300MA Stationary MCFC 300 kW 􀀹
          DFC 1500MA Stationary MCFC 1200 kW 􀀹
          DFC 3000 Stationary MCFC 2400 kW 􀀹
          HyPM XR (DC)
          Backup Power
          Systems Stationary PEM 8 - 16 kW 􀀹
          HyPM XR Power
          Modules Stationary PEM 4 - 12 kW 􀀹
          HyPM HD Power
          Modules Mobility PEM 4 - 65 kW 􀀹
          HyPM Power Packs Mobility PEM / hybrid 12 kW continuous 􀀹
          HySTAT Hydrogen
          Station Hydrogen Refueling
          Alkaline
          Electrolysis 4 - 60 Nm3/hr 􀀹
          ElectraGen™ 3XTR Backup PEM - Liquid Fuel 3 kW 􀀹
          ElectraGen™ 5XTR Backup PEM - Liquid Fuel 5 kW 􀀹
          ElectraGen™ 3 XTi Backup PEM - Liquid Fuel 3 kW 􀀹
          ElectraGen™ 5 XTi Backup PEM - Liquid Fuel 5 kW 􀀹
          iGen™ Portable PEM 250 W 􀀹
          ElectraGen ™ 3 Backup PEM - Hydrogen 3 kW 􀀹
          ElectraGen ™ 5 Backup PEM - Hydrogen 5 kW 􀀹
          Medis Power Pack** Portable
          Direct
          Borohydride 1 W TBD
          www.medistechnologies.com
          Mobion 30M*** Micro / Portable DMFC 30 W 􀀹
          www.idatech.com
          www.ballard.com
          www.fuelcellenergy.com
          www.hydrogenics.com
          www mechtech com
          Page 1 of 3 Copyright US Fuel Cell Council 2008 For a detailed product listing, including product descriptions and efficiencies, visit www.

CFC Solutions GMBH now MTU Onsite Energy GmbH

on Monday, December 8, 2008

MTU Onsite Energy GmbH is a subsidiary business unit of MTU Friedrichshafen, a subsidiary of Tognum AG, involved in manufacturing large diesel engines and complete propulsion systems.

(thanks for the Update Bryan-see comments below)

  • CFC Solutions became MTU Onsite Energy GmbH (Fuel Cell Systems Division) in September 2008.

    The company manufactures diesel engines for propulsion systems in ships, distributed power plants, heavy vehicles and rail in the power range between 35 and 9,000 kW.


    Since 1990, MTU has shown interest in fuel cells which resulted in the foundation of MTU CFC Solutions, now CFC Solutions.

    The company has been involved in the development and manufacture for molten carbonate fuel cells ("HotModule", 250kW).
  • Since the end of 2000, MTU is also involved in PEM technology in order to develop fuel cell drive systems for off-highway applications.
  • The focus of this work has been on propulsion systems for ships and on-board power generation. The aim is to develop scalable fuel cell systems on a modular basis so that they can be modified to match the requirements of the various applications as closely as possible.
  • In October 2003, CFC has presented a PEM fuel cell powered sailing vessel using Ballard Power fuel cell units.

Partners

  • CFC and Fuel Cell Energy are partners to a cross-licensing and cross-selling agreement. MTU Friedrichshafen has been a shareholder in FCE since 1989.
  • In July 2003, RWE Fuel Cells, a subsidiary of RWE (one of Europe's leading utilities) and responsible for RWE's fuel cell business has joined MTU CFC Solutions by bying a 25.1% stake in the company.

Fuel Cell Market Analysis

on Friday, December 5, 2008

The following excellent article was originally published on 18 November, 2008. By the Institue fur Kraft Fahr Zuge in Aachen, Germany.
It is such an accurate and complete summary of my own research that I present it. The only difference I would have is an editors note I added near the bottom. I disagree that this technology is 4 years away from major market penetration. I believe it is imminent.

-Editor

The Rest Published in the Road2hy.com
.

The application of Fuel Cell and Hydrogen technologies to the industrial and commercial markets takes the form of co-generation or tri-generation systems.

  • Systems available today have total powers in the range 100kW to 2-3MW (higher power, modular, systems are possible but have not been installed) and produce electricity, heating and, sometimes, cooling.
  • Most quoted efficiencies are 70-80% overall and 45-50% electrical, suggesting that co-generation using Fuel Cells will yield significant reductions in GHG emissions.
  • In developed countries the existing industrial and commercial power/heat sources are responsible for approximately 20-25% of the total GHG emissions, making these sectors prime targets for Fuel Cell system introduction [1].

The arguments for introducing Fuel Cell technology into these sectors are as follows:

  • Many countries are investigating distributed generation strategies, influenced by renewable sources such as wind, solar, tidal and others. Fuel Cell co-generation systems suit this strategy well [2].
  • The industrial and commercial sectors already use well-established fuel chain infrastructures for on-site generation and heating, plus the energy utility grids.

Some industries already produce large quantities of potential fuel, suitable for reforming, as a direct by-product of their manufacturing/production processes.

  • An excellent example is the chlor-alkali industry that, globally, produces 200 tonnes of hydrogen per hour. If used in Fuel Cell co-generation plants this hydrogen could produce more than 3GW of electrical power and heating.

Co/tri-generation system efficiencies are much higher than those based on more conventional, established technologies.

  • Fuel Cell systems will offer these sectors large potential fuel cost savings.
  • Industries and commercial businesses will be increasingly keen to exploit GHG emissions reduction opportunities as legislation impacts their bottom line.
  • Legislation in some countries is already forcing the adoption of increasing quantities of energy from renewable or greener sources.
  • Combined with increasing conventional fossil fuel prices in the long term, a significant market already exists for Fuel Cell systems [3].

The choice or availability of fuel influences the type of Fuel Cell and reformer technology selected. Fuel Cell distributed or co-generation development is following a number of potential technology streams but with varying levels of development achieved so far. The systems that are already being produced commercially are:

  • Molten Carbonate (MCFC) for applications of 200kW-2.5MW.
  • Phosphoric Acid (PAFC) for applications of 100-500kW.
  • Proton Exchange (PEM) for high power applications of 250kW-1MW
  • Solid Oxide (SOFC): Considerable development is still required before true commercialisation is a reality for SOFC, in spite of the significant number of companies active in this particular technology stream. Systems that have been announced so far will be suitable for many applications and operate at powers between 100-250+ kW.

All these Fuel Cell systems incorporate fuel reformers where necessary so that the unit can operate on alternatives to hydrogen.

Fuel Cell co-generation systems, furthermore, must compete with long-established technologies and utility grids that are, at present, cheaper but are far less efficient. The primary goals must be as follows:

  • Reduce co-generation system costs to more competitive levels.
  • Reduce cell-stack operating temperatures to enable improved cell chemistry and the use of cheaper materials for the cell stacks.
  • Improve fuel reformer technologies to reduce fuel impurities and hence reduce cell degradation.
  • Extend cell-stack lifetime.

Main Players

An overview of companies known to be developing fuel cell systems for commercial and industrial applications is presented. The main players known to be active in industrial and commercial applications of H2&FC systems .


These companies can be divided into

  1. manufacturers of fuel cell stacks
  2. system integrators who develop the actual products
  3. Those that do both.

(Editors Note: not in original article) Some companies are emerging which integrate multiple renewable energy generation (OREG) with energy provision though Power Purchase Agreements, In Deregulated environments. These engineering companies use multiple renewable technologies to provide entire energy solutions to a variety of energy users.)

Some of the key players in this sect a highlighted in the text below.

  • CFC Solutions (Germany) manufacture high temperature fuel cell CHP systems. To date, CFC have installed more that 20 of their HotModule® fuel cell systems throughout Europe. These systems typically generate 245 kW of electricity and 180 kW of heat. CFC use Fuel Cell Energy’s Direct FuelCell® technology [4].
  • Fuel Cell Energy (Danbury, Connecticut USA) is continuing to develop modular Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) systems with powers ranging from 300kW up to 2.4MW. They claim to be able to build systems of up to 50MW using their existing, smaller FC modules. Fuel Cell Energy owns and operates a manufacturing plant in Torrington, Connecticut, with a capacity of 50 MW of fuel cells per year at present, with plans underway to increase the production capacity [5]. Fuel Cell Energy has been working closely with its partner Enbridge to develop more efficient plants. Using the energy produced from micro-turbines, that reduce the very high natural gas transmission network operating pressure to acceptable levels, FCE is able to increase the overall efficiency of their Fuel Cell system.
  • NedStack (Arnhem, the Netherlands) have developed low power PEM fuel cell stacks that they sell to integration companies. NedStack is also developing a much larger PEM system, for industrial / commercial power applications, with a power output as high as 1MW [6].

  • Nuvera (Italy) is continuing the third phase of development of the Forza™ high power PEM Fuel Cell system specifically for chemical process industries. The hydrogen by-product of many chemical industries is an ideal fuel for this system. Nuvera expect Forza to produce up to 250kW at a net efficiency of 55-60%. Forza is being developed to allow many modules to be combined in systems with maximum powers of 2-3MW [7].
  • Rolls Royce Fuel Cell Systems (UK) are developing industrial/commercial SOFC co-generation systems for commercialisation in 2010. Their first field trials should start in late 2008 or early 2009.

  • UTC Power (South Windsor, Connecticut, USA) is a single source developer, integrator and supplier of on-site, stationary co-generation and tri-generation PAFC systems with powers ranging from 195-400kW electrical plus additional heating and cooling outputs [8].
  • Wärtsilä (Finland) have developed a 20 kW SOFC CHP system for commercial applications. Their unit, called WFC20, is based on planar SOFC technology developed by Tospøe Fuel Cells A/S (Lyngby, Denmark). In July 2008, Wärtsilä’s SOFC CHP system was demonstrated at the Vaasa Housing Fair where it was used to supply electricity and heat, while being fuelled by landfill gas.

Recent Developments

  • Since early 2007 Fuel Cell Energy’s largest customer, POSCO Power of Korea, has ordered nearly 40MW of systems, for delivery in 2008-2010.
  • UTC Power, a United Technologies Corp. company, announced in July 2008 that four models of its PureComfort® combined cooling, heating and power systems had met the emissions limits of the California Air Resources Board. This will allow UTC systems to be sited in any suitable location in California. CARB has now ordered 4 systems from UTC as part of the California Distributed Generation certification program.
  • On 11 June 2008, UTC Power announced that the New York Power Authority (NYPA) had selected the company to supply 12 fuel cells totalling 4.8 MW of power for the Freedom Tower and three other new towers under construction at the World Trade Centre site in lower Manhattan.
  • Delivery of UTC’s PureCell systems will begin in January of 2009. This installation has already attracted considerable interest from the building and site system services communities [9]. An overview of some of the recent key milestones is presented below.

Key Milestones and Future Developments for applying H2&FC technology to the Industrial and Commercial Market Sectors

Drivers and Barriers

Fuel cell technology holds considerable promise for the industrial and commercial market sectors. The potential flexibility and efficiency of stationary systems, plus the many applications for which they would be ideal sources of power, are certain to be recognised.

  • Fuel Cell systems are used predominantly in niche industries at present, but this is likely to change rapidly as the technology gains acceptance and recognition.
  • This does depend on many elements of course, including costs, lifetimes and air quality/emissions/GHG offsetting legislation.

The findings of this study indicate that large co- and tri-generation systems available to the market now can offer significant advantages over existing technologies.

True commercialisation is limited, however, by the unproven nature of Fuel Cell-based systems and by suspected cell stack lifetimes. There is a strong, well-developed existing market for conventional products and limited Government subsidies available, in only a very few countries, to encourage Fuel Cell technologies. The high overall efficiencies of Fuel Cell systems do not yet adequately outweigh the inertia within these markets, though that situation is changing.

Only a small number of companies are successfully exploiting these markets and, until now, only to a very limited extent. Fuel Cell systems require considerable further development and have made only the smallest dent in the dominance of existing energy generation technologies. Recent shifts in Government energy strategies towards renewables, GHG emission reduction and distributed generation will improve the prospects for the future, but slowly.


More companies are carrying out research and development than are producing commercial systems. Competition should increase and help to drive the cost of the Fuel Cell systems down in time. This analysis suggests that is not likely before 2012-2015.

The current industrial and commercial uses for Fuel Cell systems are niche applications only that use existing fuel infrastructures and hence rely on the available fuel reformer technology.

Manufacturers must build on their successes so far and find new opportunities by:
Continuing development of reformers to improve efficiency and maximise cell stack lifetimes through fuel impurity reductions.

Use modular systems that can be adapted to specific requirements but benefit from economies of scale from common components, cell stacks and balance of plant machinery.

Improving overall system efficiencies to further distinguish between Fuel Cells and conventional generation technology.


In conclusion, the Industrial and Commercial market sectors have huge potential for growth - approximately 10 billion GWh per year is generated globally for these markets alone. Continued investment in R&D towards better products, plus increased take-up rate of Fuel Cell systems in the near future due to improved public acceptance of the technology, will ensure growth. There is no doubt that these market sectors will be critically important to the whole Fuel Cell industry.

The Rest Published in the Road2hy.com

altergy

on Thursday, November 20, 2008

Altergy

  • Freedom Power™ systems are fully integrated, self-contained, high efficiency fuel cell systems that generate power at the point-of-use.
  • These clean and green, CARB-certified,* zero-emission power generators deliver the power quality, reliability, and on-demand standby and ride-through capabilities required for telecommunications, cable/broadband, data centers, homeland security and other essential 24/7 operations.
  • Freedom Power™ Systems provide an excellent alternative to batteries and generators. Their plug and play design allows system modules to stand alone or be combined to produce a wide range of power output (1-30kW).

Altergy Systems

140 Blue Ravine Road

Folsom, CA 95630, USA
Tel: 916.458.8590

Fax: 916.200.0488

Email: info@altergy.com

DOE Report on a Hydrogen Economy

on Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Analysis of "The Effects of a Transition to a Hyrdogen Economy on Employment in the United States" by the DOE

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 required a massive Study on the effect that the transition to the Hyrdogen Economy was going to have on our overall economy. This is becasue the technolgies were already commecrailly vaiable, and would change the way we do everything from how we use power in fixed sites to how we drive.

The study, The Effects of a Transition to a Hyrdogen Economy on Employment in the United States. was published in July 2008 and presented to Congress.

They Examined:

• Replacement effects of new goods and services
• International competition
• Workforce training requirements
• Multiple possible fuel cycles, including usage of raw materials
• Rates of market penetration of technologies
• Regional variations based on geography
• Specific recommendations of the study

Note: do not be daunted by the dates - T Boon Pickins Media Campaign and the Gas prices, coupled with the new Energy bill, the auto manufacturing crisis, and the need for an economic shift will sigificantly accelerate the transition.

  • The study estimated the employment impacts of a transformation of the U.S. economy to the use of hydrogen between 2020 and 2050.

  • They considered a rapid scenario and a slow scenario, but the conclusion is that the economy is already in transition, and will be transformed by 2050.

Onsite Hyrdrogen Power Generation or (Onsite Renewable Energy Generation or OREG

  • fuel cells initially provide power, including back-up power, for remote locations not easily served by the electric power transmission and distribution grid.

  • Following success in these markets, fuel cells begin to penetrate markets for
    portable power, then markets for all types of distributed power.

  • For back-up and remote power markets, users are willing to pay a premium for secure, reliable electricity. Such markets include hospitals, hotels, data centers, and computer facilities, where uninterrupted
    power is critical.

  • While these initial markets provide the sales volumes to launch the industry,
    the fuel cells themselves operate relatively few hours per year and displace little grid
    electricity.

Portable Power

  • Portable power is a likely follow-on market for fuel cells.

  • Fuel cells are being eyed for a wide array of portable applications ranging from consumer electronics to small-scale power production.

  • Portable electronics (e.g., cell phones and notebook computers) utilizing
    premium lithium-ion and nickel metal-hydride batteries are particularly promising candidates for substitution by fuel cells.

  • Premium batteries are popular because of their high energy
    density.

  • As portable devices become more complex and their power requirements increase,
    fuel cells become an increasingly promising alternative.

  • Since 2002, the number of devices containing premium batteries that the average American carries has grown 10% annually, to 0.5 devices per person.18 As the variety and functionality of portable consumer electronics grow, each person will carry increasingly multi-functional devices.

  • While this will increase the demand for portable power, it may not increase the total
    number of devices beyond some natural limit of perhaps 1 device per person on average.

  • Assuming the base-case population forecast of 420 million, some 400 million portable fuel
    cells could be in use in 2050.

Power Grid Displacement


  • As fuel cells penetrate the portable power market and enter the broad residential and
    commercial power market, electricity displacement becomes substantial.

  • Like fuel cells for mobile applications, stationary fuel cells are assumed to meet program cost and performance targets.

  • In this study, stationary fuel cells are assumed to be natural gas fueled, where the fuel
    cell system includes an integrated reformer to produce the hydrogen

  • Stationary Fuel Cells in the HFI Scenario
    In the HFI Scenario, stationary fuel cells are assumed to achieve 1% penetration of “new”
    electric demand in 2020, 5% in 2035, and 10% in 2050.19

  • “New” demand is defined as the difference between electricity demand in 2015 and the analysis year (2020, 2035 or 2050), and is meant to include a variety of markets – back-up power, portable power and the broader market for residential and commercial power – which increasingly shift to fuel cells.

Penetration by fuel cells results in displacement of 0.01 quad of grid electricity in 2020, 0.3 quads in 2035, and slightly over 1 quad in 2050.





Here is an executive Summary:







  • The Technology is "fairly mature" now


  • Natural gas is NOT expected to be along term Feedstock for Fule cells.


  • All Hyrdogen will be produced Locally, and will NOT be an international Commodity


  • They expect a $370 Billion ( yes Billion) dollar PER YEAR drop in money going overseas by 2050.


  • They anticipate fully fuel celled vehcilpes available by 2018 followed by a rapid replacement of the light-duty vehicle market


  • All light duty vehciles are replaced by 2050









  • They anticipate that fule infrastructure will be insltalled in "lock step" with vehicle demand growth.

Fuel Production

  • Initially, most hydrogen is produced on-site, in relatively small, “distributed” facilities or
    delivered to fueling stations from existing, large industrial plants.


  • Distributed facilities are more costly to build and maintain than gas stations.


  • As demand for hydrogen rises, fuel production shifts to centralized facilities that can
    better capture economies of scale


  • Regionalized resources will dictate Hyrdogen development methodology. Regions with nearby coal suppliesand CO2 sequestration sites opt for more coal gasification while those with ample wind or biomass favor hydrogen production technologies that rely more on those resources.

From centralized production facilities, hydrogen is delivered to local fuel stations where it is
dispensed along with conventional motor fuels.

As demand increases, delivery technologies shift from primarily tanker trucks carrying cryogenic liquid hydrogen to a mix of trucks carrying cold compressed hydrogen in insulated high-pressure tanks, and, beginning between 2020 and 2035, gas pipelines.

By 2050, when hydrogen has replaced nearly all motor gasoline, most local fuel stations no longer dispense gasoline.

Storage

  • The development of an on-board hydrogen storage technology for hydrogen-powered
    vehicles has implications for the hydrogen delivery infrastructure.
  • Currently, compressed hydrogen storage is the dominant approach for on-board hydrogen storage, with most systems using 5,000 psi composite tanks.
  • Next generation systems, which have started to appear in demonstrations use higher pressure 10,000 psi tanks.

International Impacts

  • With Falling OPEC Incomes, OPEC purchases inthe US will be reduced
  • Their leanding to Industrialized Countries will be reduced.

Read the Whole Report from at fuelcells.org


Fuel Cells 101

A Chemical Reaction : No combustion

Hyrdogenics

on Monday, November 10, 2008

Hydrogenics is a fuel cell specialist:


They have offices in a number of Countires HQ is Canada.
This is the US office

Hydrogenics USA
27201 Tourney Road,
Suite 201
Valencia, CA, USA 91355

Phone: 661.253.2593
Fax: 905.361.3626


OnSite Generation - turnkey hydrogen generation systems for a full range of hydrogen applications.

Power Systems - fuel cell power products, with particular focus on fully integrated power modules and fuel cell hybrid power packs.

At Hydrogenics we are focused on offering customers the best hydrogen and fuel cell products by leveraging our proprietary technologies across select target markets. We have positioned Hydrogenics as the “Hydrogen Go To Company” by offering a comprehensive suite of products with a range of technology choices that meet the needs of both hydrogen energy and industrial hydrogen customers.

Hydrogenics' products offer solutions for today’s hydrogen applications:
onsite hydrogen generation systems: modular HySTAT™ hydrogen generation systems, based on water electrolysis, provide onsite hydrogen in multiple configurations to meet varied industrial and energy needs. Hydrogenics is also developing hydrogen onsite solutions based on natural gas reformation:
fuel cell power systems: HyPM® proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell power modules for mobility and backup power applications and HyPX Power Packs for forklift applications.

-This seems to be their production Hydrogen Generation Technology

HySTAT-A Hydrogen StationsHydrogenics' HySTAT-A Hydrogen Station, based on time-tested alkaline electrolysis technology, has been providing onsite hydrogen generation solutions to a wide range of industrial and energy markets for many decades. -( this is industry Standard technol0goy)


-This seems to be R & D Hydrogen Generation Technology


HySTAT-P Hydrogen Stations - product under developmentThe HySTAT-P Hydrogen Station, based on Hydrogenics' proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis technology, is an emerging electrolysis technology positioned to provide onsite hydrogen for applications that require a flexible, compact electrolyzer product. Hydrogenics is advancing this technology for strategic markets with plans to offer commercial products by 2007.
In addition, Hydrogenics works with key partners to engineer and deliver turnkey hydrogen stations based on natural gas reformation.
Contact us for further information or to request a quote.

UTC Power

on Monday, November 3, 2008

Wise men say only fuels rush in, but UTC Power can't help trying to overhaul the way we think about power generation. UTC Power is the division of United Technologies that absorbed UTC Fuel Cells in 2007.

UTC Power makes onsite power generation systems for commercial, transportation, and space applications. Its systems use fuel cells, microturbines, chillers, and heat exchangers in various combinations to generate power from natural gas or exhaust energy with little or no emissions.

While the "hydrogen economy" touted by the Bush Administration and industry leaders may take years to develop, UTC Power is working in the here and now, providing fuel cells for bus lines in California and Connecticut.

-Google Finance

UTC Power Has an interesting 400 KW Power Generation system
Called the Model 400 Purcell System

  • 400 KW CCHP ( Combined Cool, Heat and Power)
  • Run on Natural Gas Pipe

Fuel Cell

  • 195-300 KW in increments (Combined Heat and Power)
  • Runs on Hydrogen Tanks

Limnia, Inc. Solid State Hydrogen Storage Cassetts

They Produce Hyrdogen Solid-State Cassetts and recharging systems.
They appear to be in the first round of financing, and all equipment must be custom built right now.

Limnia, Inc.Energy Without End™
Corporate Headquarters
601 Van Ness Avenue
Suite E3613
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States
Tel: 510-868-2862

http://devlimnia.com/index.php

info (@) limini.com

sales

legal

Invest


(All this is from thge limina website and is unverified)

HYDROGEN PACKS VS. BATTERIES

  • Batteries catch on fire quite a bit and have been the result of many more fires and explosions than hydrogen.
  • AT&T 's U-verse TV service now has an exploding battery problem, making it necessary for the firm to replace 17,000 backup batteries in its nationwide network.
  • The Federal Government has OUTLAWED Lithium Batteries on airplanes because they explode unexpectedly so often. Batteries blow up when they want to. Hydrogen blows up when you tell it to.
  • Limnia technology does not provide an explosive source like batteries do.
  • Limnia power systems run many, many times longer and provide massively greater range per charge than batteries.
  • The run time of batteries constantly shortens while Limnia technology does not.
    Batteries have a problematic “Memory Effect” while Limnia technology does not.
  • Limnia technology is instant charge via hot-swap while battery packs require hours to recharge.
  • Charge life- Limnia systems have an extensive charge life while batteries have a much shorter end-of-life metric.
  • The cost per 300 mile range for a Limnia technology car system is far lower than a battery system.
  • A Limnia powered car TODAY that will drive 300 miles without a refill is 50% or less of the price of a battery car that will drive 300 miles without a refill.
  • A Limnia system can be charged from a completely clean home energy system but batteries need to be charged from a “sour-grid”.
  • Limnia technology can make energy at home. Batteries cannot.
  • Limnia technology has a far higher storage density than batteries.
  • Limnia systems are far less bulky than batteries.
  • The weight of batteries is so great that it reduces the range of travel of a vehicle which causes the use of wasteful energy just to haul the batteries along with the car. Limnia energy systems weigh far less.
  • The disposal of batteries, after use, presents a deadly environmental issue while Limnia technology does not.
  • Limnia technology does not self discharge like batteries.
  • Batteries cause a greater carbon footprint than Limnia technology

HYDROGEN TANKS VS. HYDROGEN SOLID STATE CASSETTES

  • Infrastructure cost per cubic foot of H2 is far more expensive with pressurized and liquefied hydrogen.
  • In an accident, the pressure tanks could shoot, like a rocket, through hundreds of innocent bystanders killing or maiming most of them.
  • Limnia technology uses off-the-shelf, domestically available scalable components but tanks require special service safety parts.
  • Limnia technology has fully rechargeable, recyclable, pressure variable output but tanks do not.
  • Limnia technology use may improve insurance premiums but tanks will always increase premiums.
  • Factory man-power productivity increases using Limnia at the plant-level over tanks
    All stored H2 is live and explosive with tanks but not with Limnia.

Limnia increases balance-of-plant metric but tanks reduce the metrics.

  • Limnia’s source compound agnostic but tanks are fixed to source compound.
  • Limnia is fully patent protected and tanks are not.
  • Limnia base hardware investment is future-protected while tanks are only partially protected.
  • Limnia technology is fully systemically modular while tanks are fixed.
  • Limnia technology fits the box-like form factor of car while tanks dictate their location.
  • Tanks require an extensive safety compound required around customer storage area while Limnia does not.
  • Tanks need an annual X-Ray and material audit while Limnia technology does not.
    Limnia technology does not flow across the ground and surfaces in a fire like napalm like liquid hydrogen.

GASOLINE VS. HYDROGEN SOLID STATE CASSETTES

  • Limnia technology does not flow across the ground and surfaces in a fire like napalm like gasoline.
  • Gasoline service stations are one of the primary sources and causes of cancer. Limnia eliminates the need to go to a service station.
  • The gasoline and associated vapors in a vehicle while you drive cause cancer, brain damage and numerous health issues and Limnia technology does not.
  • The residue after use of gasoline causes numerous environmental damage issues and Limnia technology does not.
  • The residue after use of gasoline causes numerous environmental damage issues and Limnia technology does not.
  • Gasoline is increasing in cost and hydrogen sources and end product are decreasing in cost.

Hydrogen Production Manufacturs

on Friday, October 24, 2008

Companies that Sell Hydrogen Production Equipment for Home, Small Business, and Refueling Stations
Avalence, LLC

STUART ENERGY (Canada)
Pasadena , California Office
Stuart Energy, USA
3360 East Foothill Blvd.
Pasadena, CA , USA 91107-3111
Phone: 626-440-1962 Fax: 626-440-1963
Email: info@stuartenergy.com

RRC Kurchatov Institute
Tel: (095) 196 9997 Fax: (095) 196 7262
Email: epv@ITERcoun.msk.SU
Hamilton Sundstrand (a United Technologies Company)

www.hsssi.com/Applications/Echem/Hydrogen/Metal.html

Southern Technology Applications Center (STAC)
One Progress Blvd, Suite 24
Alachua, Fl 32615
Phone: (904) 462-3913 Fax: (904) 462-3898
Email: esander@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu

Fuji Electric Corporate Research and Development, Ltd.
2-2-1, Nagasaka, Yokosuka City 240-01, Japan

Bookmark and Share