The Concept of Additionality Under Kyoto

on Tuesday, August 4, 2009

The concept of additionality addresses the question of whether the project would have happened anyway, even in the absence of revenue from carbon credits.

  • Only carbon credits from projects that are "additional to" the business-as-usual scenario represent a net environmental benefit.

Carbon projects that yield strong financial returns:
  • even in the absence of revenue from carbon credits;
  • or that are compelled by regulations;
  • or that represent common practice in an industry

are usually not considered additional, although a full determination of additionality requires specialist review.

  • It is generally agreed that voluntary carbon offset projects must also prove additionality in order to ensure the legitimacy of the environmental stewardship claims resulting from the retirement of the carbon credit (offset).

According the World Resources Institute/World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD) : "GHG emission trading programs operate by capping the emissions of a fixed number of individual facilities or sources.

Under these programs, tradable 'offset credits' are issued for project-based GHG reductions that occur at sources not covered by the program.

  • Each offset credit allows facilities whose emissions are capped to emit more, in direct proportion to the GHG reductions represented by the credit.
  • The idea is to achieve a zero net increase in GHG emissions, because each ton of increased emissions is 'offset' by project-based GHG reductions.

The difficulty is that many projects that reduce GHG emissions (relative to historical levels) would happen regardless of the existence of a GHG program and without any concern for climate change mitigation.

  • If a project 'would have happened anyway,' then issuing offset credits for its GHG reductions will actually allow a positive net increase in GHG emissions, undermining the emissions target of the GHG program.

Additionality is thus critical to the success and integrity of GHG programs that recognize project-based GHG reductions."

The Rest @ Wikipedia

Bryce Dille

Bryce Dille @ JMP Securities, send me an Email

Joint implementation Projects (JI) Under Kyoto

Joint implementation (JI) is one of three flexibility mechanisms set forth in the Kyoto Protocol to help countries with binding greenhouse gas emissions targets (so-called Annex I countries) meet their obligations. JI is set forth in Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol.[1]

Under Article 6, any Annex I country can invest in emission reduction projects (referred to as "Joint Implementation Projects") in any other Annex I country as an alternative to reducing emissions domestically. In this way countries can lower the costs of complying with their Kyoto targets by investing in greenhouse gas reductions in an Annex I country where reductions are cheaper, and then applying the credit for those reductions towards their commitment goal.

A JI project might involve, for example, replacing a coal-fired power plant with a more efficient combined heat and power plant. Most JI projects are expected to take place in so-called "economies in transition," noted in Annex B of the Kyoto Protocol.[2] Currently Russia and Ukraine are slated to host the greatest number of JI projects.[3]

Unlike the case of the Clean Development Mechanism, the JI has caused less concern of spurious emission reductions, as the JI, unlike the CDM, takes place in countries which have an emission reduction requirement.

The process of receiving credit for JI projects is somewhat complex.

  • Emission reductions are awarded credits called Emission Reduction Units (ERUs), where one ERU represents an emission reduction equaling one tonne of CO2 equivalent.
  • The ERUs come from the host country's pool of assigned emissions credits, known as Assigned Amount Units, or AAUs.
  • Each Annex I party has a predetermined amount of AAUs, calculated on the basis of its 1990 greenhouse gas emission levels.
  • By requiring JI credits to come from a host country's pool of AAUs, the Kyoto Protocol ensures that the total amount of emissions credits among Annex I parties does not change for the duration of the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period.

The Rest @ Wikipedia

A Carbon Project

A carbon project refers to a business initiative that receives funding because of the cut the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) that will result.

To prove that the project will result in real, permanent, verifiable reductions in Greenhouse Gases, proof must be provided in the form of a

Carbon projects are developed for reasons of voluntary environmental stewardship, as well as legal compliance under a Greenhouse Gas Cap & Trade program.

Voluntary carbon (GHG) reducers may wish to monetize reductions in their carbon footprint by trading the reductions in exchange for monetary compensation.

The transfer of environmental stewardship rights would then allow another entity to make an environmental stewardship claim.

There are several developing voluntary reduction standards that projects can use as guides for development.

Carbon projects have become increasingly important since the advent of emissions trading under Phase I of the Kyoto Protocol in 2005.

They may be used if the project has been validated by a Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Designated Operational Entity (DOE) according the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The resulting emissions reductions may become Certified Emissions Reductions (CERs) when a DOE has produced a verification report which has been submitted to the CDM Executive Board.
There may be new project methodology validated by the CDM EB for post phase II Kyoto trading.

The Rest @ Wikipedia

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is an arrangement under the Kyoto Protocol allowing industrialised countries with a greenhouse gas reduction commitment (called Annex B countries) invest in projects that reduce emissions in developing countries as an alternative to more expensive emission reductions in their own countries.

  • A crucial feature of an approved CDM carbon project is that it has established that the planned reductions would not occur without the additional incentive provided by emission reductions credits, a concept known as "additionality".

The CDM allows net global greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced at a much lower global cost by financing emissions reduction projects in developing countries where costs are lower than in industrialized countries. However, in recent years, criticism against the mechanism has increased.

The CDM is supervised by the CDM Executive Board (CDM EB) and is under the guidance of the Conference of the Parties (COP/MOP) of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

Carbon Offsets

A carbon offset is a financial instrument aimed at a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon offsets are measured in metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO2e) and may represent six primary categories of greenhouse gases.

One carbon offset represents the reduction of one metric ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent in other greenhouse gases.

There are two markets for carbon offsets.

  • In the larger compliance market, companies, governments, or other entities buy carbon offsets in order to comply with caps on the total amount of carbon dioxide they are allowed to emit. In 2006, about $5.5 billion of carbon offsets were purchased in the compliance market, representing about 1.6 billion metric tons of CO2e reductions.[2]
  • In the much smaller voluntary market, individuals, companies, or governments purchase carbon offsets to mitigate their own greenhouse gas emissions from transportation, electricity use, and other sources. For example, an individual might purchase carbon offsets to compensate for the greenhouse gas emissions caused by personal air travel. In 2008, about $705 million of carbon offsets were purchased in the voluntary market, representing about 123.4 million metric tons of CO2e reductions.[3]

    Offsets are typically achieved through financial support of projects that reduce the emission of greenhouse gases in the short- or long-term.
  • The most common project type is renewable energy, such as wind farms, biomass energy, or hydroelectric dams.
  • Others include energy efficiency projects, the destruction of industrial pollutants or agricultural byproducts, destruction of landfill methane, and forestry projects.
  • Some of the most popular carbon offset projects from a corporate perspective are energy efficiency and wind turbine projects.[5]

Carbon offsetting has gained some appeal and momentum mainly among consumers in western countries who have become aware and concerned about the potentially negative environmental effects of energy-intensive lifestyles and economies.

The Kyoto Protocol has sanctioned offsets as a way for governments and private companies to earn carbon credits which can be traded on a marketplace.

The protocol established the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), which validates and measures projects to ensure they produce authentic benefits and are genuinely "additional" activities that would not otherwise have been undertaken.

  • Organizations that are unable to meet their emissions quota can offset their emissions by buying CDM-approved Certified Emissions Reductions.

    Offsets may be cheaper or more convenient alternatives to reducing one's own fossil-fuel consumption. However, some critics object to carbon offsets, and question the benefits of certain types of offsets.

    The Rest @ Wikipdedia

Micro Inverter News - More, Simpler, Distributed DC- AC Inversion

on Monday, August 3, 2009

Enphase Energy Inc. Announces Executive Appointment
05/18/2009

Enphase Energy Inc. announced it has secured $22.5 million in new financing, led by Madrone Capital Partners. This round of funding also includes new investor Bay Partners as well as existing investors Third Point Ventures, RockPort Capital Partners and Applied Ventures, LLC. Jamie McJunkin, General Partner of Madrone Capital Partners will join Enphase Energy's Board of Directors.

Akeena Solar Inc. and Enphase Energy Inc. Announce Strategic Partnership
02/2/2009

Akeena Solar Inc. and Enphase Energy Inc. have announced a strategic partnership to develop and market Andalay solar panel systems with ordinary AC house current output instead of high voltage DC output. Andalay AC panels are expected to cost less to install and provide higher performance than ordinary DC panels. Under the agreement Akeena will purchase a minimum of 5,000 microinverters in each of 2009 and 2010, and Enphase will supply up to 100,000 microinverters to Akeena during this same timeframe. These microinverters will be built into Akeena's award-winning Andalay solar panels.

Enphase Energy Inc. Launches Enphase Energy Micro-Inverter System
06/10/2008

Enphase Energy Inc. announced the general availability of the Enphase Energy Micro-inverter System. The heart of the system, the Enphase Micro-inverter, utilizes advanced technologies to maximize energy harvest and increase reliability of solar systems.

In addition, the Enphase Micro-inverter turns each solar module into a smart module by connecting it to the Internet, thereby providing unprecedented visibility and analysis of solar system performance.

Installers and owners of Enphase Micro-inverter Systems will benefit from dramatically simplified design, installation and management of their solar energy systems. As a result, this new approach can help accelerate the broad adoption of solar technology by increasing the return on investment of residential and commercial solar systems.

The Rest @ Business Week

Cash Instead of Tax Credits for Qualifing Energy Generation Projects

August 2009

U.S. Department of the Treasury and Department of Energy to make Direct Cash Payments for Businesses Developing Renewable Energy Facilities-

The U.S. government announced Friday that it is now accepting applications for renewable energy funding lead by President Barack Obama’s initiative to expand nationwide sustainability and green energy job prospects. The U.S. Department of Energy, along with the U.S. Department of the Treasury will be allocating direct payments in place of tax credits to companies that establish and develop renewable energy facilities; funding to the sum of roughly $3 billion for approximately 5,000 generation plants producing varying sources of renewable energy.

Secretary Steven Chu states, “This program will play a major role in encouraging private sector capital to invest in clean energy development, creating new jobs that can’t be outsourced. It is an investment that will continue to help our economy grow and ensure advancement in clean and renewable energy development.”

The Recovery Act approves the Treasury to make direct monetary payments to businesses which construct and activate facilities that produce sustainable energy beginning January 1, 2009, which was previously apportioned through tax credits. The Department of the Treasury and Energy anticipate a rush of businesses applying for the cash payment, which will help to support a prompt stimulation in regional economies. “As we move quickly to get our economy back on track and to repair the financial system, we must make investments that lay the foundation for a stronger economic future,” said Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. “Too many renewable energy projects have stalled due to a lack of financing.

The Recovery Act program will lead to investment in our long-term energy needs, move us towards energy independence, increase jobs at energy-specific businesses, and protect our environment.”

The Rest @ Green Energy NEws

Renewable Ventures a Fotowatio Company, Gets $200M Solar Funding

SAN FRANCISCO, Aug. 3 /PRNewswire/ -- Renewable Ventures, a Fotowatio company, today announced the completion of Solar Fund V to finance more than $200 million of new solar energy projects across the United States.



The fund's first project is a two-megawatt solar photovoltaic project located in Ft. Collins, Colorado that will sell energy to Colorado State University and renewable energy credits to one of the state's utilities, Xcel Energy.


Solar Fund V, the fifth fund organized by Renewable Ventures and the first as Fotowatio's U.S.-based subsidiary, reinforces the company's growth strategy in the United States. The fund will focus on the development and acquisition of commercial, public sector, and utility-scale solar projects from one to 10 megawatts in size.


"With this new infusion of capital, we stand ready to work with businesses, utilities and others to immediately finance, develop, or acquire megawatts of large-scale solar projects in the U.S.," said Renewable Ventures CEO Matt Cheney.


Solar Fund V is structured to include both debt from John Hancock (a unit of Manulife Financial Corporation, NYSE: MFC) and equity from Renewable Ventures and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC), and will enable the construction and permanent financing of around 35 megawatts in the next year. The combination of debt and equity enables the fund to seek a broader range of federal government incentives, improving project economics for prospective customers such as municipalities, universities, electric utilities and companies.


"Wells Fargo's and John Hancock's continued commitment to investing in renewable energy will allow us to replicate the success of our previous relationships," added Mr. Cheney. "Solar Fund V has been designed to use capital and incentives available under the stimulus program in a way that can accelerate the development of more solar projects and quickly create jobs in the U.S. renewable energy sector."


"We are pleased to continue building our relationship through setting up this fund with Renewable Ventures," said Barry Neal, director of Environmental Finance at Wells Fargo. "Wells Fargo's commitment to clean energy and Renewable Ventures' development and operating experience together will help our nation take advantage of clean, renewable energy."


"John Hancock is proud to be working once again with Renewable Ventures, extending our partnership by helping to finance, develop, and deliver clean, renewable energy projects making a difference globally and to the communities we serve," said Jerry Hanrahan, Managing Director, at John Hancock.


The fund's first project, to be located at Colorado State University, will generate enough solar power to provide more than 10% of the electricity needs on the university's Foothills Campus. The 15-acre solar power plant is expected to be one of the largest solar installations at a U.S. university when it is completed in 2009.


Fotowatio is one of the world's largest independent solar producers, and has financed, owns, and operates 130 megawatts of photovoltaic projects in the United States and Europe. The company recently began construction on a five-megawatt solar photovoltaic project in Italy and is developing over 1,000 megawatts of concentrating solar power and solar photovoltaic projects across Spain, Italy and the United States.


Renewable Ventures finances and operates solar projects of all sizes, from one to 50 megawatts and larger. The company's recent projects in the United States include the photovoltaic system at Denver International Airport, the largest solar PV project in North America at Nellis Air Force Base, and installations at Macy's, Roche, University of California-San Francisco, California State University-Fresno, Lowe's, and many others.



  • Fotowatio, one of the largest solar power companies in the world, is an independent renewable power producer (IPP) with 130 megawatts of solar projects in operation in the United States and Europe. Fotowatio has more than 1,000 megawatts in development across the United States, Spain and Italy using both PV and CSP technologies. A global company, Fotowatio is owned by GE Energy Financial Services, Landon Group, and Qualitas Venture Capital. Renewable Ventures is Fotowatio's U.S. global business unit with an exclusive focus on the development of commercial and utility-scale solar projects throughout the United States.

For more information, please visit http://www.fotowatio.com/ or http://www.renewableventures.com/
For information about Wells Fargo, please visit http://www.wellsfargo.com/
For information about John Hancock Financial, please visit http://www.johnhancock.com/


The Rest @ PRN Newswire

Active Energy Management Industry

And the host of companies looking to make such in-home energy display systems is expanding rapidly, with dozens of startups such as

Integrators: People who have busines models that selecte and group pieces of technology and services to activly monitor Energy Use in a facility.

Utility Companies will have to provide the power for these guys, and there are many of them. They will buy software that holds it all together.

People that make software that holds it all together, and are comepting to sell to the utility companies

Comverge Gets Another Smart Meter Management Deal

By Jeff St. John

Comverge (COMV) has landed another deal that calls for it to turn down homes' energy use during peak demand times with pagers at first, and with smart meters later on.The deal is with Dominion Virginia Power (D), and calls for Comverge to manage about 117 megawatts of commercial and industrial power loads.

Comverge will also provide its Apollo software platform to manage demand response devices for about 150,000 homes – representing roughly 150 megawatts of power use – which the utility wants to hook up with smart meters eventually.

The idea is to turn down home air conditioners, water heaters and pool pumps – the devices Comverge can now control – using its existing mainly pager-based communication system at first, said Mike Picchi, Comverge's interim president and CEO.

Then, as Dominion rolls out its smart meters, made by German manufacturer Elster, Comverge will switch over to using them as the gateway into the home instead, Picchi said. Comverge's Apollo software can manage both means of control, he said (see Green Light post).

  • The East Hanover, N.J.-based demand response provider has a similar contract with Pepco Holdings Inc., which plans to give its 1.9 million customers General Electric smart meters enabled with Silver Spring Networks communications gear over the next four years.
  • Comverge also is working with smart meter maker Itron to link its smart meters to Comverge's set of ZigBee-enabled thermostats and other systems. In Texas, it's working on integrating its systems with smart meters from Landis+Gyr, Picchi said.
  • After all, while every utility installing smart meters says they'll eventually be able to turn down home energy use, none have done so in a full-scale commercial deployment, he said (see The Elusive Smart Meter-Demand Response Combo).
  • That gives utilities like Pepco and Dominion a short-term choice, he said - wait for smart meters to be in place to start controlling home energy use, or turn to Comverge's existing set of programs, which range from turnkey systems that utilities can control to those managed by Comverge itself.
  • Comverge mainly controls power in commercial and industrial facilities, a market it shares with demand response competitors such as EnerNoc Inc. (ENOC), CPower, EnergyConnect and Constellation NewEnergy (see Green Light post).

The idea is to turn down energy use when utilities are facing peak demand, saving the cost of building and buying power from "peaker" plants that may need to run only a few hundred hours every year.
But Comverge distinguishes itself from those competitors in that about a quarter of its more than 3,000 megawatts under management come from homes.

Other residential demand response programs exist out there, but most are managed directly by utilities, though Cooper Power Systems does residential demand response work as well.

Big facilities and offices are easier to manage when it comes to demand response – they're bigger targets, and they tend to have staff, and some form of building control system, already in place to carry out the task.


Whether or not millions of homes can be as efficiently networked and controlled for peak demand reduction is a big question in the demand response field (see Demand Response: The Home vs. C&I Debate).

The Electric Power Research Institute predicted in January that the residential, commercial and industrial sectors would roughly share the market for demand response over the coming decades. But expanding the residential share of the pie will require a whole new host of technologies – and business models and regulatory structures – to get there.


One uncertainty is how to get the homeowner involved. Most of Comverge's existing residential demand response programs involve homeowners that sign up for cheaper power in exchange for giving the utility the power to adjust their thermostats for them.


But such direct load control could well give way to using the millions of smart meters being deployed across the United States to offer homeowners a wider variety of options (see 8.3M Smart Meters and Counting in U.S.)

In particular, direct utility control is being downplayed by many of the companies looking to the next generation of smart meters to enable their home energy management offerings (see The Smart Home, Part I).

The idea is that giving customers some kind of control – even if it's only control over choosing settings that automatically turn down stuff via utility commands anyway – is likely to be more popular with utility customers, as well as the regulatory bodies that tell utilities how they can spend their money.

Simply giving customers a view into their energy use can yield big savings, according to many pilot trials of in-home energy devices (see Smart Grid: Test Customers Give Thumbs Up).

And the host of companies looking to make such in-home energy display systems is expanding rapidly, with dozens of startups such as Tendril Networks, EnergyHub, Energate, Control4, Greenbox Technology, Onzo, AlertMe, eMeter and OpenPeak all competing with each other, as well as new home energy systems from Google, Microsoft and Cisco, for utilities' favor (see stories here, here and here).


Some of those systems extend beyond providing information to actual control over home energy suckers, using digital thermostats or "smart plugs" that turn power on and off at the wall socket. Those can be controlled with or without utility involvement, though analysts predict it will take subsidies from utilities – or perhaps a move by telecommunications companies to add them on to existing home entertainment and security systems – to make them more widely popular (see The Telco Home Energy Invasion).


Using smart meters to send pricing signals that encourage people to cut down on using power when its most expensive could be one way to do that. Many utilities are testing such pricing schemes in pilot projects. Some, such as Arizona utilities Salt River Project and Arizona Public Service and a host of utilities in Canada's Ontario province, such as Milton Hydro, are trying them out in a more widespread fashion.

In the meantime, General Electric and Whirlpool are planning to make smart appliances that can power down in response to utility or homeowner controls, though how fast those could come to market will depend on how quickly utilities settle on a standard set of technologies (see GE's Smart Appliances: Smarter With GE Home Energy Manager).

The question of standards and technologies, in turn, is likely to be guided by emerging guidelines for the $3.9 billion in federal stimulus grants directed at smart grid projects, including smart meter deployments (see DOE Hands Out $47M for Smart Grid Demos).

The Rest @ Seeking Alpha

Prudent Uses Vanadium-based Redox Regenerative Fuel Cell

I got an interesting comment on one of my posts about distributed power generation and storage.

Charles Toca representing Prudent Energy VRB Energy Storage System (VRB-ESS) says they have an energy storage system base on the the vanadium-based redox regenerative fuel cell that converts chemical energy into electrical energy.

This is from their website:

-Editor

How It Works

The VRB Energy Storage System (VRB-ESS) is an electrical energy storage system based on the patented vanadium-based redox regenerative fuel cell that converts chemical energy into electrical energy.

Energy is stored chemically in different ionic forms of vanadium in a dilute sulphuric acid electrolyte. The electrolyte is pumped from separate plastic storage tanks into flow cells across a proton exchange membrane (PEM) where one form of electrolyte is electrochemically oxidized and the other is electrochemically reduced. This creates a current that is collected by electrodes and made available to an external circuit. The reaction is reversible allowing the battery to be charged, discharged and recharged.

The principle of the VRB is shown in more detail in Figure 1 - it consists of two electrolyte tanks, containing active vanadium species in different oxidation states

  • (positive: V(IV)/V(V) redox couple,
  • negative: V(II)/(III) redox couple).

These energy-bearing liquids are circulated through the cell stack by pumps. The stack consists of many cells, each of which contains two half-cells that are separated by a membrane. In the half-cells the electrochemical reactions take place on inert carbon felt polymer composite electrodes from which current may be used to charge or discharge the battery.

The VRB-ESS employs vanadium ions in both half-cell electrolytes. Therefore, cross-contamination of ions through the membrane separator has no permanent effect on the battery capacity, as is the case in redox flow batteries employing different metal species in the positive and negative half-cells. The vanadium half-cell solutions can even be remixed bringing the system back to its original state.

The open circuit cell voltage at a concentration of 2 mole per liter for each vanadium species is 1.6 V when fully charged. The relatively fast kinetics of the vanadium redox couples allows high Coulombic and voltage efficiencies to be achieved without costly catalysts. The same current is passed through all of the cells as they are arranged in series. Such systems have many admirable properties including high efficiency, long cycle life, ease of scalability and negligible environmental impact.

More....

The VRB-ESS can economically store and supply large amounts of electricity on demand and is focused on stationary applications. It is a long life, cost effective, low maintenance, efficient technology that allows for the scalability of power and storage capacity independently.

The VRB-ESS is particularly beneficial to renewable energy providers, utilities and end users through its ability to “inventory” electricity, allowing for the optimal match of supply and demand.

The VRB-ESS is well suited for a variety of applications. Enabling the provision of “firm” capacity from intermittent renewable generation such as wind and solar; more cost effective and efficient generation of electricity in remote areas; capital deferral for utilities; and load levelling (peak shaving) applications. The VRB-ESS is also capable of providing backup power solutions including applications for utility sub-stations and telecommunication sites.

......

T

CleanTech Investment Has Record 2nd Quarter

US venture capital investment in cleantech companies in Q2 2009

  • reached $572m, an increase of 73 per cent in terms of capital,
  • with 48 financing rounds, a 100 per cent increase in number of transactions

compared to Q1 2009, according to an Ernst & Young analysis based on data from Dow Jones VentureSource.

Compared to Q2 08, the second-highest quarter for cleantech investment on record, the Q2 09 results were 59 per cent and 16 per cent below those record levels in terms of capital and number of transactions respectively.

Venture capital investment in cleantech in Q2 09 was lead by the Energy/Electricity Generation category, which raised $157m, a quarterly increase of 181 per cent as compared to Q1 09.

  • Within this category, solar deals received the lion’s share of capital, more than trebling to $148m compared to the prior quarter.
  • Deal activity in the solar segment represented 26 per cent of all quarterly cleantech investment by venture capital firms.

    The solar results were driven by deals such as the $25m, first round investment in Skyline Solar, based in Mountain View, CA, which was led by New Enterprise Associates.

The Energy Efficiency category grew 168 per cent from Q1 09 to $152m due to power and efficiency management service deals that accounted for the majority of investment.

This segment experienced 143 per cent growth during Q2 09, attracting $93m. A notable deal in this segment was the $30m investment in the residential smart grid company Tendril. This investment was led by VantagePoint Venture Partners and has since followed with a partnership with GE to enable smart appliances to communicate over metering and broadband networks.

The demand for environmentally-friendly transportation options encouraged investment in the Alternative Fuels category to $53m in Q2 09, driven by the $40m later stage round investment in biofuels company Gevo.

Additionally, the Transportation sector received a $65m investment in Q2 09. The majority of this funding came from Daimler AG’s $50m investment in Tesla Motors.

‘The quarterly uptick reflects investor confidence in the ability of cleantech companies to capitalize on market opportunities,’ said Joseph A Muscat, Ernst & Young, Americas director of cleantech.

‘While enacted and anticipated government actions have helped bolster confidence and catalyse new capital, we believe that leading cleantech companies will be defined by their ability to execute on business plans and advance their technologies through commercialisation and distribution despite the challenging economy.’

Quarterly venture capital investment in cleantech exhibits a shift from companies in the product development stage toward companies in the start-up and shipping product stages. Start-up cleantech companies received 8 per cent of financing rounds in Q2 09 compared to none in Q1 09. Companies at the shipping product stage accounted for 65 per cent of financing rounds compared to 54 per cent in the prior quarter. By contrast, product development stage companies received just 27 per cent of financing rounds compared to 46 per cent last quarter.

Q2 09 results also illustrate the continued mix of investors who are partnering to advance the US cleantech market. Seven of the top ten cleantech venture deals included participation by private equity, hedge fund or corporate investors, according to the analysis. For example, the $54m investment in Powerspan Corp., a carbon dioxide capture technology company, was made by a syndicate of investors that included VC firms, private equity firms, corporate investors and a hedge fund.

The rebound in venture capital investment in cleantech was accompanied by a rise in private equity and asset backed financings. Around $240m of clean energy private equity investment was recorded, a rise of 12 per cent.

This figure includes the $69m round secured by the battery manufacturer A123 in Watertown, MA, and the $50m investment in Spectrawatt, a solar cell manufacturer.

Clean energy asset financings grew significantly, increasing from $307m in Q1 2009 to $2.9bn in Q2 2009.

Wind was the primary driver of asset backed financing activity, with deals such as the $504m financing secured by First Wind for a 203.5MW project. Solar projects were also supported. SunPower Corporation obtained an undisclosed amount of project financing for its 1.1MW photovoltaic project from Wells Fargo.

Additionally, there were 12 US M&A transactions of which three had disclosed values totaling $157m, according to JS Herold. Six of the deals include alternative fuel companies.

Government support continues to influence the growth of the US cleantech market. The US Department of Energy released more than $47m from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 to accelerate the completion of eight smart grid demonstration projects in seven states.

At state level, the state of Michigan is providing GE with $74m in tax incentives in light of the company’s plan to build a $100m advanced-manufacturing centre to develop renewable-energy technologies near Detroit.

Prospectively, the Department of Treasury’s guidance released in July for accessing grants in lieu of the investment tax credits for qualified energy property, as authorised by ARRA, was another positive step for the cleantech market, particularly as the DOE begins to review applications in August and makes payments within 60 days after receipt of qualified applications.
The Rest @ New Energy World

Introduction to Photovoltaics

on Sunday, August 2, 2009

Bookmark and Share